An improved algorithm of multicast topology inference from end-to-end measurements

Hui Tian, Hong Shen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Multicast topology inference from end-to-end measurements has been widely used recently. Algorithms of inference on loss distribution show good performance in inference accuracy and time complexity. However, to our knowledge, the existing results produce logical topology structures that are only in the complete binary tree form, which differ in most cases significantly from the actual network topology. To solve this problem, we propose an algorithm that makes use of an additional measure of hop count. The improved algorithm of incorporating hop count in binary tree topology inference is helpful to reduce time complexity and improve inference accuracy. Through comparison and analysis, it is obtained that the time complexity of our algorithm in the worst case is O(l2) that is much better than O(l3) required by the previous algorithm. The expected time complexity of the algorithm is estimated at O(l.log2l), while that of the previous algorithm is O(l3).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
EditorsAlex Veidenbaum, Kazuki Joe, Hideharu Amano, Hideo Aiso
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages376-384
Number of pages9
ISBN (Print)3540203591, 9783540397076
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume2858
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Keywords

  • End-to-end measurement
  • Hop count
  • Multicast
  • Topology inference

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An improved algorithm of multicast topology inference from end-to-end measurements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this