TY - JOUR
T1 - Application of ultrasonic dual-mode artificially intelligent architecture in assisting radiologists with different diagnostic levels on breast masses classification
AU - Li, Chunxiao
AU - Li, Jiajun
AU - Tan, Tao
AU - Chen, Kun
AU - Xu, Yi
AU - Wu, Rong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Turkish Society of Radiology 2021.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - PURPOSE We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability in breast tumor classification with or without the aid of an innovative dual-mode artificial intelligence (AI) architecture, which can automatically integrate information from ultrasonography (US) and shear-wave elastography (SWE). METHODS Diagnostic performance assessment was performed with a test subset, containing 599 images (from September 2018 to February 2019) from 91 patients including 64 benign and 27 malignant breast tumors. Six radiologists (three inexperienced, three experienced) were as-signed to read images independently (independent diagnosis) and then make a secondary diagnosis with the knowledge of AI results. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and Cohen's κ statistics were calculated. RESULTS In the inexperienced radiologists’ group, the average area under the ROC curve (AUC) for diagnostic performance increased from 0.722 to 0.765 (p = 0.050) with secondary diagnosis using US-mode and from 0.794 to 0.834 (p = 0.019) with secondary diagnosis using dual-mode compared with independent diagnosis. In the experienced radiologists’ group, the average AUC for diagnostic performance was significantly higher with AI system using the US-mode (0.812 vs. 0.833, p = 0.039), but not for dual-mode (0.858 vs. 0.866, p = 0.458). Using the US-mode, interobserver agreement among all radiologists improved from fair to moderate (p = 0.003). Using the dual-mode, substantial agreement was seen among the experienced radiologists (0.65 to 0.74, p = 0.017) and all radiologists (0.62 to 0.73, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION AI assistance provides a more pronounced improvement in diagnostic performance for the inexperienced radiologists; meanwhile, the experienced radiologists benefit more from AI in reducing interobserver variability.
AB - PURPOSE We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance and interobserver variability in breast tumor classification with or without the aid of an innovative dual-mode artificial intelligence (AI) architecture, which can automatically integrate information from ultrasonography (US) and shear-wave elastography (SWE). METHODS Diagnostic performance assessment was performed with a test subset, containing 599 images (from September 2018 to February 2019) from 91 patients including 64 benign and 27 malignant breast tumors. Six radiologists (three inexperienced, three experienced) were as-signed to read images independently (independent diagnosis) and then make a secondary diagnosis with the knowledge of AI results. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and Cohen's κ statistics were calculated. RESULTS In the inexperienced radiologists’ group, the average area under the ROC curve (AUC) for diagnostic performance increased from 0.722 to 0.765 (p = 0.050) with secondary diagnosis using US-mode and from 0.794 to 0.834 (p = 0.019) with secondary diagnosis using dual-mode compared with independent diagnosis. In the experienced radiologists’ group, the average AUC for diagnostic performance was significantly higher with AI system using the US-mode (0.812 vs. 0.833, p = 0.039), but not for dual-mode (0.858 vs. 0.866, p = 0.458). Using the US-mode, interobserver agreement among all radiologists improved from fair to moderate (p = 0.003). Using the dual-mode, substantial agreement was seen among the experienced radiologists (0.65 to 0.74, p = 0.017) and all radiologists (0.62 to 0.73, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION AI assistance provides a more pronounced improvement in diagnostic performance for the inexperienced radiologists; meanwhile, the experienced radiologists benefit more from AI in reducing interobserver variability.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106182268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5152/DIR.2021.20018
DO - 10.5152/DIR.2021.20018
M3 - Article
C2 - 34003119
AN - SCOPUS:85106182268
SN - 1305-3825
VL - 27
SP - 315
EP - 322
JO - Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
JF - Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
IS - 3
ER -