TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of AlphaFold2 Structures for Hit Identification across Multiple Scenarios
AU - Gu, Shukai
AU - Yang, Yuwei
AU - Zhao, Yihao
AU - Qiu, Jiayue
AU - Wang, Xiaorui
AU - Tong, Henry Hoi Yee
AU - Liu, Liwei
AU - Wan, Xiaozhe
AU - Liu, Huanxiang
AU - Hou, Tingjun
AU - Kang, Yu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Chemical Society
PY - 2024/5/13
Y1 - 2024/5/13
N2 - The introduction of AlphaFold2 (AF2) has sparked significant enthusiasm and generated extensive discussion within the scientific community, particularly among drug discovery researchers. Although previous studies have addressed the performance of AF2 structures in virtual screening (VS), a more comprehensive investigation is still necessary considering the paramount importance of structural accuracy in drug design. In this study, we evaluate the performance of AF2 structures in VS across three common drug discovery scenarios: targets with holo, apo, and AF2 structures; targets with only apo and AF2 structures; and targets exclusively with AF2 structures. We utilized both the traditional physics-based Glide and the deep-learning-based scoring function RTMscore to rank the compounds in the DUD-E, DEKOIS 2.0, and DECOY data sets. The results demonstrate that, overall, the performance of VS on AF2 structures is comparable to that on apo structures but notably inferior to that on holo structures across diverse scenarios. Moreover, when a target has solely AF2 structure, selecting the holo structure of the target from different subtypes within the same protein family produces comparable results with the AF2 structure for VS on the data set of the AF2 structures, and significantly better results than the AF2 structures on its own data set. This indicates that utilizing AF2 structures for docking-based VS may not yield most satisfactory outcomes, even when solely AF2 structures are available. Moreover, we rule out the possibility that the variations in VS performance between the binding pockets of AF2 and holo structures arise from the differences in their biological assembly composition.
AB - The introduction of AlphaFold2 (AF2) has sparked significant enthusiasm and generated extensive discussion within the scientific community, particularly among drug discovery researchers. Although previous studies have addressed the performance of AF2 structures in virtual screening (VS), a more comprehensive investigation is still necessary considering the paramount importance of structural accuracy in drug design. In this study, we evaluate the performance of AF2 structures in VS across three common drug discovery scenarios: targets with holo, apo, and AF2 structures; targets with only apo and AF2 structures; and targets exclusively with AF2 structures. We utilized both the traditional physics-based Glide and the deep-learning-based scoring function RTMscore to rank the compounds in the DUD-E, DEKOIS 2.0, and DECOY data sets. The results demonstrate that, overall, the performance of VS on AF2 structures is comparable to that on apo structures but notably inferior to that on holo structures across diverse scenarios. Moreover, when a target has solely AF2 structure, selecting the holo structure of the target from different subtypes within the same protein family produces comparable results with the AF2 structure for VS on the data set of the AF2 structures, and significantly better results than the AF2 structures on its own data set. This indicates that utilizing AF2 structures for docking-based VS may not yield most satisfactory outcomes, even when solely AF2 structures are available. Moreover, we rule out the possibility that the variations in VS performance between the binding pockets of AF2 and holo structures arise from the differences in their biological assembly composition.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85191062242&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01976
DO - 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01976
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85191062242
SN - 1549-9596
VL - 64
SP - 3630
EP - 3639
JO - Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
JF - Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
IS - 9
ER -