Abstract
This study investigates how negative publicity, country-of-origin (COO) and psychological contracts affect consumer response to local versus foreign brands in relational and transactional contexts. Three experimental studies were undertaken to assess these relationships. The findings show that corporate ability (CA)-related negative publicity is significantly related to foreign brand evaluations, whereas corporate social responsibility (CSR)-related publicity disproportionately affects local brands. Psychological contract has a significant mediation effect on the relationship between negative publicity and brand evaluations. The study provides insights into the interplay between corporate communication, branding and consumer behaviors. The study findings can be tailored for optimizing corporate communication strategies and brand management.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Brand Management |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
Keywords
- Brand evaluation
- Brand publicity
- Consumer behavior
- Country-of-origin
- Psychological contract
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How negative publicity shapes consumer responses: the roles of country-of-origin and psychological contracts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver