TY - JOUR
T1 - Learners' perception of data privacy when using AI language models
T2 - Reflective diary analysis of undergraduates in China
AU - Xu, Xiao Shu
AU - Liu, Jia
AU - Zheng, Rong
AU - Lei, Vivian Ngan Lin
AU - An, Qin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors
PY - 2025/10
Y1 - 2025/10
N2 - The rapid advancement of AI language models in education—exemplified by tools such as ChatGPT—has highlighted their transformative potential alongside pressing ethical concerns, particularly regarding data privacy. This study explores undergraduate’ perceptions of data privacy at a comprehensive university in China, using reflective diaries based on five open-ended prompts derived from a literature review. Grounded in Lazarus's Cognitive and Affective Processing Theory and Kahneman's Dual-Process Theory, thematic analysis reveals that students have significant concerns about data leakage, unethical data exploitation through big data analytics, and algorithmic bias that may undermine fairness in academic evaluation and reinforce existing inequalities. Findings call for enforceable data governance in schools—compliance with child-data laws (e.g., GDPR, COPPA), clear school–vendor roles, purpose limitation/minimisation/retention controls, and age-appropriate notices with consent/assent where required. This study contributes to the discourse on AI ethics in education, offering actionable insights for educators and policymakers aiming to ensure the responsible, secure, and equitable integration of AI technologies in learning environments.
AB - The rapid advancement of AI language models in education—exemplified by tools such as ChatGPT—has highlighted their transformative potential alongside pressing ethical concerns, particularly regarding data privacy. This study explores undergraduate’ perceptions of data privacy at a comprehensive university in China, using reflective diaries based on five open-ended prompts derived from a literature review. Grounded in Lazarus's Cognitive and Affective Processing Theory and Kahneman's Dual-Process Theory, thematic analysis reveals that students have significant concerns about data leakage, unethical data exploitation through big data analytics, and algorithmic bias that may undermine fairness in academic evaluation and reinforce existing inequalities. Findings call for enforceable data governance in schools—compliance with child-data laws (e.g., GDPR, COPPA), clear school–vendor roles, purpose limitation/minimisation/retention controls, and age-appropriate notices with consent/assent where required. This study contributes to the discourse on AI ethics in education, offering actionable insights for educators and policymakers aiming to ensure the responsible, secure, and equitable integration of AI technologies in learning environments.
KW - AI language model
KW - Data privacy
KW - Higher education
KW - Reflective diary
KW - Security
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105015388655
U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105491
DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105491
M3 - Article
C2 - 40934848
AN - SCOPUS:105015388655
SN - 0001-6918
VL - 260
JO - Acta Psychologica
JF - Acta Psychologica
M1 - 105491
ER -