TY - GEN
T1 - Learning Styles in Computer Science
T2 - 55th IEEE Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2025
AU - Gomes, Anabela
AU - Fonseca, Nuno Gil
AU - Lei, Philip I.S.
AU - Lam, Cahn Tong
AU - Chan, Calana
AU - Nhadumbuque, Geraldo
AU - Marcelino, Maria José
AU - Soares, Leonardo
AU - Mendes, António José
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This research full paper investigates the learning styles of computer science students enrolled in introductory programming courses in institutions located across four geographically distant countries or regions: Macao (Group GMo), Mozambique (Group GMz), Brazil (Group GBz), and Portugal (Group GPt). Using the Felder-Silverman learning style model and the Index of Learning Styles (ILS) instrument, we analyzed data from 302 students. Results revealed variations in learning style distributions, with all groups showing preferences for visual and sensing styles while differing notably in active/reflective and sequential/global dimensions. Students of Group GMo demonstrated a strong reflective tendency, while Group GBz and Group GPt students tended to active learning. Group GMz students generally presented more balanced profiles across dimensions. Educators should adapt their teaching methodologies to accommodate these diverse learning preferences, mainly when teaching complex subjects like programming. We propose various pedagogical strategies aligned with different learning styles to enhance student engagement and contribute to improving academic outcomes in introductory programming courses.
AB - This research full paper investigates the learning styles of computer science students enrolled in introductory programming courses in institutions located across four geographically distant countries or regions: Macao (Group GMo), Mozambique (Group GMz), Brazil (Group GBz), and Portugal (Group GPt). Using the Felder-Silverman learning style model and the Index of Learning Styles (ILS) instrument, we analyzed data from 302 students. Results revealed variations in learning style distributions, with all groups showing preferences for visual and sensing styles while differing notably in active/reflective and sequential/global dimensions. Students of Group GMo demonstrated a strong reflective tendency, while Group GBz and Group GPt students tended to active learning. Group GMz students generally presented more balanced profiles across dimensions. Educators should adapt their teaching methodologies to accommodate these diverse learning preferences, mainly when teaching complex subjects like programming. We propose various pedagogical strategies aligned with different learning styles to enhance student engagement and contribute to improving academic outcomes in introductory programming courses.
KW - CS1
KW - learning styles
KW - programming education
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105033045653
U2 - 10.1109/FIE63693.2025.11328731
DO - 10.1109/FIE63693.2025.11328731
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105033045653
T3 - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
BT - 55th IEEE Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2025 - Conference Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 2 November 2025 through 5 November 2025
ER -