TY - JOUR
T1 - Short-Term High-Intensity Interval Training on Body Composition and Blood Glucose in Overweight and Obese Young Women
AU - Kong, Zhaowei
AU - Sun, Shengyan
AU - Liu, Min
AU - Shi, Qingde
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Zhaowei Kong et al.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - This study was to determine the effects of five-week high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, blood glucose, and relevant systemic hormones when compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in overweight and obese young women. Methods. Eighteen subjects completed 20 sessions of HIIT or MICT for five weeks. HIIT involved 60 × 8 s cycling at 90% of peak oxygen consumption (V - O 2 p e a k) interspersed with 12 s recovery, whereas MICT involved 40-minute continuous cycling at 65% of V - O 2 p e a k. V - O 2 p e a k, body composition, blood glucose, and fasting serum hormones, including leptin, growth hormone, testosterone, cortisol, and fibroblast growth factor 21, were measured before and after training. Results. Both exercise groups achieved significant improvements in V - O 2 p e a k (+7.9% in HIIT versus +11.7% in MICT) and peak power output (+13.8% in HIIT versus +21.9% in MICT) despite no training effects on body composition or the relevant systemic hormones. Blood glucose tended to be decreased after the intervention (p = 0.062). The rating of perceived exertion in MICT was higher than that in HIIT (p = 0.042). Conclusion. Compared with MICT, short-term HIIT is more time-efficient and is perceived as being easier for improving cardiorespiratory fitness and fasting blood glucose for overweight and obese young women.
AB - This study was to determine the effects of five-week high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, blood glucose, and relevant systemic hormones when compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in overweight and obese young women. Methods. Eighteen subjects completed 20 sessions of HIIT or MICT for five weeks. HIIT involved 60 × 8 s cycling at 90% of peak oxygen consumption (V - O 2 p e a k) interspersed with 12 s recovery, whereas MICT involved 40-minute continuous cycling at 65% of V - O 2 p e a k. V - O 2 p e a k, body composition, blood glucose, and fasting serum hormones, including leptin, growth hormone, testosterone, cortisol, and fibroblast growth factor 21, were measured before and after training. Results. Both exercise groups achieved significant improvements in V - O 2 p e a k (+7.9% in HIIT versus +11.7% in MICT) and peak power output (+13.8% in HIIT versus +21.9% in MICT) despite no training effects on body composition or the relevant systemic hormones. Blood glucose tended to be decreased after the intervention (p = 0.062). The rating of perceived exertion in MICT was higher than that in HIIT (p = 0.042). Conclusion. Compared with MICT, short-term HIIT is more time-efficient and is perceived as being easier for improving cardiorespiratory fitness and fasting blood glucose for overweight and obese young women.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991665866&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1155/2016/4073618
DO - 10.1155/2016/4073618
M3 - Article
C2 - 27774458
AN - SCOPUS:84991665866
SN - 2314-6745
VL - 2016
JO - Journal of Diabetes Research
JF - Journal of Diabetes Research
M1 - 4073618
ER -