TY - CHAP
T1 - Unpacking Nursing Students’ Metacognitive Strategies in GenAI-Assisted Peer Feedback
T2 - Insights from Epistemic Network Analysis
AU - Wei, Shuling
AU - Wei, Wei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2026.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - This study used Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) to examine how nursing students used metacognitive strategies during GenAI-assisted peer feedback. Sixteen undergraduate nursing students joined a structured feedback task. Each student used a Moodle platform supported by generative AI that helped guide planning, monitoring, and evaluating while giving feedback. Based on expert ratings, students were divided into high- and low-quality feedback groups using a median-split method. The ENA results showed clear structural differences between the two groups. Students who produced high-quality feedback built an active and connected metacognitive cycle that linked “Validating (VD)”, “Executing Strategy (ES)”, “Review (RW)”, and “Revision (RN). Their work reflected a habit of checking, reflecting, and adjusting ideas while using GenAI support. Students who produced low-quality feedback tended to stay in the planning dimension, including “Setting Goal (SG)” and “Making Plan (MP)”), and rarely engaged in monitoring or evaluating. This pattern suggested a form of cognitive outsourcing, where students relied too heavily on AI to guide their responses instead of reviewing their own reasoning. The findings show that metacognitive strategies can shape how students engage with GenAI tools. The study underscores the importance of designing pedagogical interventions that integrate metacognitive scaffolding to sustain learners’ agency, foster reflective feedback practices, and ensure that GenAI serves as a catalyst rather than a substitute for deep clinical reasoning.
AB - This study used Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) to examine how nursing students used metacognitive strategies during GenAI-assisted peer feedback. Sixteen undergraduate nursing students joined a structured feedback task. Each student used a Moodle platform supported by generative AI that helped guide planning, monitoring, and evaluating while giving feedback. Based on expert ratings, students were divided into high- and low-quality feedback groups using a median-split method. The ENA results showed clear structural differences between the two groups. Students who produced high-quality feedback built an active and connected metacognitive cycle that linked “Validating (VD)”, “Executing Strategy (ES)”, “Review (RW)”, and “Revision (RN). Their work reflected a habit of checking, reflecting, and adjusting ideas while using GenAI support. Students who produced low-quality feedback tended to stay in the planning dimension, including “Setting Goal (SG)” and “Making Plan (MP)”), and rarely engaged in monitoring or evaluating. This pattern suggested a form of cognitive outsourcing, where students relied too heavily on AI to guide their responses instead of reviewing their own reasoning. The findings show that metacognitive strategies can shape how students engage with GenAI tools. The study underscores the importance of designing pedagogical interventions that integrate metacognitive scaffolding to sustain learners’ agency, foster reflective feedback practices, and ensure that GenAI serves as a catalyst rather than a substitute for deep clinical reasoning.
KW - Epistemic Network Analysis
KW - GenAI-assisted peer feedback
KW - Metacognitive strategies
KW - Nursing education
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105034990918
U2 - 10.1007/978-981-95-8824-4_1
DO - 10.1007/978-981-95-8824-4_1
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:105034990918
T3 - Lecture Notes in Educational Technology
SP - 3
EP - 12
BT - Lecture Notes in Educational Technology
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
ER -