TY - GEN
T1 - WIP
T2 - 54th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2024
AU - He, Zhenni
AU - Pang, Patrick Cheong Iao
AU - Lam, Chi Kin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 IEEE.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - As the Artificial Intelligence (AI) industry rapidly expands in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) of China, the demand for AI talent continues to grow, higher educational institutions need to continuously update its AI education to adapt technological progress. However, there is currently a lack of understanding on AI education in the GBA. This work-in-progress research paper analyzes the current state of AI bachelor degrees within the GBA and compares it with the well-established curricula in the United States (US). The study selected a sample from the top 8 universities based on QS rankings and employed an enhanced AI course literacy categories model for the inductive and comparative analysis of AI course settings. The preliminary study highlights differences between universities in the GBA and the US in terms of course content depth and teaching strategies. The GBA universities emphasize a balanced and comprehensive curriculum that ensures all students have a solid foundation in both AI theories and technologies. In contrast, US universities prioritize a broader, interdisciplinary approach that fosters innovation and development of practical skills. The findings suggest that GBA universities could benefit from adopting some of the strategies used by US universities, such as adjusting the proportion of elective courses and increasing the availability of interdisciplinary courses. This would promote personalized student development and interdisciplinary learning, better preparing students to meet the challenges and opportunities of the AI era.
AB - As the Artificial Intelligence (AI) industry rapidly expands in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA) of China, the demand for AI talent continues to grow, higher educational institutions need to continuously update its AI education to adapt technological progress. However, there is currently a lack of understanding on AI education in the GBA. This work-in-progress research paper analyzes the current state of AI bachelor degrees within the GBA and compares it with the well-established curricula in the United States (US). The study selected a sample from the top 8 universities based on QS rankings and employed an enhanced AI course literacy categories model for the inductive and comparative analysis of AI course settings. The preliminary study highlights differences between universities in the GBA and the US in terms of course content depth and teaching strategies. The GBA universities emphasize a balanced and comprehensive curriculum that ensures all students have a solid foundation in both AI theories and technologies. In contrast, US universities prioritize a broader, interdisciplinary approach that fosters innovation and development of practical skills. The findings suggest that GBA universities could benefit from adopting some of the strategies used by US universities, such as adjusting the proportion of elective courses and increasing the availability of interdisciplinary courses. This would promote personalized student development and interdisciplinary learning, better preparing students to meet the challenges and opportunities of the AI era.
KW - Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education
KW - Higher Education. Comparative Analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000791628&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10893136
DO - 10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10893136
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:105000791628
T3 - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
BT - 2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2024 - Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Y2 - 13 October 2024 through 16 October 2024
ER -