TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality or quantity? Exploring mechanisms linking producer subsidy to soybean production by DID models
AU - Yi, Zhu
AU - Zhang, Tao
AU - Wang, Xi
AU - Wang, Hao
AU - Liu, Xieqihua
AU - Feng, Chao
AU - Jia, Qiaoran
AU - Zheng, Jiansong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - The implementation of the producer subsidy marks a pivotal shift in China’s grain price regulation, transitioning from direct interventions to more market-based policies. However, the specific effects of such policies on food supply remain obscure. This study leverages panel data from eight soybean-producing provinces in China during 2012–2022, and employs difference-in-differences (DID) models, to assess the dual impacts of the subsidy on both the quantity and quality of soybean production. The findings indicate that while the policy significantly boosted soybean yield per capita and per unit area, its effect on improving soybean quality was limited. Moreover, the policy led to a notable decline in the number of grain farmers, reducing labor supply in agriculture, while simultaneously encouraging higher levels of mechanization, as farmers increased investments in non-labor inputs for soybean cultivation. The implications of findings are essential for developing a sustainable grain industry that ensures both the quantity and quality of national food security.
AB - The implementation of the producer subsidy marks a pivotal shift in China’s grain price regulation, transitioning from direct interventions to more market-based policies. However, the specific effects of such policies on food supply remain obscure. This study leverages panel data from eight soybean-producing provinces in China during 2012–2022, and employs difference-in-differences (DID) models, to assess the dual impacts of the subsidy on both the quantity and quality of soybean production. The findings indicate that while the policy significantly boosted soybean yield per capita and per unit area, its effect on improving soybean quality was limited. Moreover, the policy led to a notable decline in the number of grain farmers, reducing labor supply in agriculture, while simultaneously encouraging higher levels of mechanization, as farmers increased investments in non-labor inputs for soybean cultivation. The implications of findings are essential for developing a sustainable grain industry that ensures both the quantity and quality of national food security.
KW - Producer subsidy
KW - difference-in-differences model
KW - grain supply
KW - soybean
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105031502565
U2 - 10.1080/23311932.2026.2634425
DO - 10.1080/23311932.2026.2634425
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105031502565
SN - 2331-1932
VL - 12
JO - Cogent Food and Agriculture
JF - Cogent Food and Agriculture
IS - 1
M1 - 2634425
ER -