TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative evaluation of China’s artificial intelligence policies
T2 - A PMC index-based modeling approach
AU - Liu, Xia
AU - Zhuang, Xuan
AU - Zhang, Hongfeng
AU - Zhang, Han
AU - Wang, Yuli
AU - Chen, Juntao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2026/2
Y1 - 2026/2
N2 - With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), various countries have introduced policies to address the social, economic, and ethical challenges brought by technological advancements. This study systematically evaluates the effectiveness of China’s AI policies based on the Policy Model Consistency (PMC) method and conducts a comparative analysis with policies from developed countries in Europe and the United States. By constructing a multi-dimensional quantitative assessment system that encompasses indicators such as policy types, timeliness, content, fields, evaluation, tools, and effectiveness levels, this study fills a gap in the existing research on quantitative evaluation. Text mining and high-frequency word analysis revealed the core themes and focus areas of the policies, laying the groundwork for subsequent quantitative analysis. The study finds that China’s AI policies have achieved significant results in promoting technological innovation, industrial development, and social transformation; however, shortcomings remain in legal protection, ethical regulation, cross-domain collaboration, and sustainable development issues. Further cross-national comparisons indicate that there are differences between China and developed countries in Europe and the United States in terms of AI policy design and implementation, particularly regarding the application of policy tools and the driving forces behind international collaboration. Based on the empirical analysis results using the PMC index model, this study proposes targeted policy optimization suggestions aimed at enhancing policy execution and adaptability. This study not only provides an innovative framework for the quantitative evaluation of AI policies but also offers theoretical support for the collaborative development of global AI policies.
AB - With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), various countries have introduced policies to address the social, economic, and ethical challenges brought by technological advancements. This study systematically evaluates the effectiveness of China’s AI policies based on the Policy Model Consistency (PMC) method and conducts a comparative analysis with policies from developed countries in Europe and the United States. By constructing a multi-dimensional quantitative assessment system that encompasses indicators such as policy types, timeliness, content, fields, evaluation, tools, and effectiveness levels, this study fills a gap in the existing research on quantitative evaluation. Text mining and high-frequency word analysis revealed the core themes and focus areas of the policies, laying the groundwork for subsequent quantitative analysis. The study finds that China’s AI policies have achieved significant results in promoting technological innovation, industrial development, and social transformation; however, shortcomings remain in legal protection, ethical regulation, cross-domain collaboration, and sustainable development issues. Further cross-national comparisons indicate that there are differences between China and developed countries in Europe and the United States in terms of AI policy design and implementation, particularly regarding the application of policy tools and the driving forces behind international collaboration. Based on the empirical analysis results using the PMC index model, this study proposes targeted policy optimization suggestions aimed at enhancing policy execution and adaptability. This study not only provides an innovative framework for the quantitative evaluation of AI policies but also offers theoretical support for the collaborative development of global AI policies.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105031063541
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0335423
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0335423
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105031063541
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 21
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 2 February
M1 - e0335423
ER -